What data standardization practices improve interoperability between automation vendors?
Data standardisation practices improve interoperability between automation vendors by establishing common formats, protocols, and communication standards that enable different systems—such as terminal operating systems, automated cranes, AGVs, and gate systems—to exchange information seamlessly. This reduces integration costs, minimises vendor lock-in, and allows container terminal automation systems to work together efficiently without manual workarounds or duplicate data entry.
What is data standardisation in terminal automation and why does it matter?
Data standardisation in terminal automation refers to the use of agreed formats, protocols, and definitions that allow different automation systems to exchange information reliably. When your automated stacking cranes, horizontal transport equipment, terminal operating system, and gate systems all speak the same language, they can share data about container movements, equipment status, and operational instructions without translation errors or manual intervention.
This matters significantly for terminal operators because non-standardised data creates operational silos that undermine the benefits of automation. Without standardisation, you face:
- Duplicate data entry across systems
- Manual workarounds to bridge communication gaps
- Limited visibility across your operation
- Vendor lock-in due to proprietary data formats
- Costly and complex system upgrades or replacements
When data is standardised, information flows seamlessly between systems. Your quay crane controller can communicate container positions directly to your yard management system, which coordinates with automated guided vehicles without human interpretation. This creates real-time operational visibility, reduces errors, and makes future technology upgrades considerably simpler. The integration complexity that often plagues brownfield automation projects—where manual and automated systems must coexist—becomes manageable when common data standards govern information exchange.
Which data standards and protocols work best for terminal automation?
EDIFACT messages remain widely used for standardised communication in container handling operations. These UN-backed electronic data interchange standards facilitate information exchange between terminal operating systems and external parties such as shipping lines, customs authorities, and hauliers. Within terminal operations, EDIFACT provides vessel manifests, container release instructions, and gate documentation in formats recognised across the industry.
For system-to-system communication within the terminal, API protocols such as REST and SOAP enable different automation components to exchange operational data. REST APIs suit real-time equipment status updates and position reporting, whilst SOAP protocols handle more complex transactional exchanges requiring guaranteed delivery and security. These protocols typically use XML or JSON messaging formats, which structure data in human-readable yet machine-processable ways.
ISO standards relevant to container handling provide reference frameworks for equipment identification, container numbering, and dimensional specifications. When your automated equipment references containers using ISO 6346 codes and positions using standardised coordinate systems, different vendor systems interpret this information identically. This becomes particularly important in automated terminals where equipment from multiple suppliers must coordinate movements precisely.
Standards by operational area
| Operational Area | Key Standards Required | Primary Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Quay Operations | Standardised crane control interfaces, vessel planning data formats | Coordinated crane-to-TOS communication |
| Yard Management | Common protocols for stack positioning, automated vehicle tasking | Precise equipment coordination |
| Gate Processing | Standardised documentation formats, OCR data exchange | Seamless information flow |
Implementing vendor-neutral standards in each area prevents the fragmented design problems that arise when control system components develop through ad hoc arrangements rather than rational, holistic design.
How do you implement data standardisation across multiple automation vendors?
Step 1: Conduct a comprehensive data audit
Begin by identifying what information flows between your systems. Map each data exchange point—crane to TOS, TOS to AGV controller, gate system to yard management—and document the current formats, frequencies, and business purposes. This audit reveals where standardisation will deliver the greatest operational benefit and where vendor-specific protocols create integration barriers.
Step 2: Establish a common data dictionary
Define how your terminal describes containers, locations, equipment states, and operational instructions. When one system calls a position “Bay-Row-Tier” and another uses “Block-Slot-Level,” you need agreed terminology that both translate to consistently. This dictionary becomes your reference for all vendor specifications and system configurations.
Step 3: Implement middleware or integration layers
Rather than requiring each system to communicate directly with every other system—which creates exponential integration complexity—a central integration platform manages translations and data routing. This approach proves particularly valuable in brownfield environments where legacy systems cannot adopt new standards directly.
Step 4: Set up data validation rules
Automated systems fail when they receive malformed position coordinates or invalid equipment identifiers. Validation catches these errors before they propagate through your operation, preventing the coordination issues and system failures that plague inadequately tested implementations. Key validation checkpoints include:
- Container identification codes (ISO 6346 compliance)
- Position coordinates (valid bay-row-tier combinations)
- Equipment identifiers (registered asset numbers)
- Timestamp formats (consistent time zones and formats)
- Status codes (predefined operational states)
Step 5: Phase your implementation strategically
Address legacy system integration through phased approaches rather than attempting complete standardisation immediately. Prioritise the highest-value data exchanges first—typically those affecting throughput or creating manual workarounds—then expand standardisation progressively. This reduces implementation risk whilst delivering measurable benefits early. New installations offer opportunities to specify standardised protocols from contract signature, whilst retrofitting existing systems requires careful management of vendor resistance and operational continuity during transitions.
How we help terminals achieve vendor interoperability
At Portwise Consultancy, we support terminals in implementing data standardisation practices that enable different automation vendors to work together effectively. Our approach addresses both technical integration and the operational realities of managing multiple suppliers within complex terminal environments.
We deliver concrete value through:
| Service | What We Do | Your Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Data architecture assessment | Evaluate current systems to identify interoperability gaps, redundant data flows, and integration points | Clear roadmap for operational improvements |
| Standardised framework design | Design data frameworks with common protocols, data dictionaries, and validation rules | Vendor-neutral architecture tailored to your needs |
| Vendor coordination support | Develop technical specifications requiring standardised interfaces and manage supplier relationships | Reduced vendor resistance and lock-in |
| Simulation-based testing | Test data exchange protocols using advanced simulation models developed over 25 years | Integration issues identified before live operations |
| Implementation and optimisation | Provide ongoing support from business case through post-commissioning | Standardised practices deliver intended benefits |
Our involvement in automation projects globally has demonstrated that addressing data standardisation early—ideally before contract signature with suppliers—significantly reduces the integration complexity, project delays, and additional costs that often affect terminal automation implementations. Understanding the industry challenges terminals face with vendor interoperability, we help you establish the foundation for flexible, future-proof terminal automation that adapts as technology evolves. Our comprehensive services ensure standardised practices deliver intended benefits from planning through operation.
If you’re interested in learning more, reach out to our team of experts today.
Related Articles
- What challenges do port consultants help solve?
- What simulation testing validates automation system performance before deployment?
- How can electrified terminals ensure reliable power supply during high-demand periods?
- How can terminals prepare for variable vessel arrival patterns?
- How does simulation reduce construction risks in ports?